top of page

Publication history

Who was Mary Shelley? How did  Frankenstein come to be what it is today?

 

 

 

 

Mary Godwin was (as we continuously discuss) the daughter of two celebrity literary figures: William Godwin, and Mary Wollstonecraft. Sadly, Wollstonecraft “died eleven days after giving birth to [Mary Godwin] in 1797, the year of the last major gothic novels” (Gaull 248). From there on forth, “raised by William Godwin, the resourceful but impatient Mary Jane Clairmont whom he married, Mary’s childhood was confused and unhappy, beset by financial and familial difficulties“ (Gaull 248). In polite terms, her relationship with her stepmother was dubious and cold; “it is reported to have been a fractious and crowded household. Mary admired and loved her father, but he was a cold and rational character, often preoccupied with his writing. She hated her stepmother, who lacked sensitivity and gave preference to her own children. During her childhood, Mary therefore built up an idealized picture of her dead mother. She was rebellious, proud of her exceptional parentage, and divisively hostile to her step-mother while turning to her father for comfort”  (Marsh 184). In fact, “in May 1811 Mrs. Godwin took Charles, little William (Mary's step-brothers), and Mary to Ramsgate for a seaside holiday. The others returned to town in June, but left Mary at a girls’ school in Ramsgate where she remained until December” (Marsh 184). From here, through mutual friends in London “by age sixteen [when] she was sufficiently educated and charming to win the love of Percy Shelley, age nineteen, a disciple of Godwin, an atheist, a vegetarian, with a small income, a pregnant wife, a child, and a history of dedicating himself to idealistic but losing causes” (Gaull 248).

Mary and Percy’s relationship, however, was not easy. After they fell in love:

Shelley told Godwin of their love. To his surprise, the famously anti-marriage philosopher was antagonistic. He urged Shelley to overcome his passion for Mary, and patch things up with Harriet (Shelley's wife). There followed a time of tension. The Godwins tried to suppress the love between Mary and Percy, but probably succeeded only in strengthening this particularly rebellious young couple’s determination and passion. Shelley paid a historic visit to Skinner Street: he gave Mary a bottle of laudanum, and produced a pistol for himself, declaring that they would die rather than endure separation. This tense time could not, and did not, last very long. At four o’clock in the morning on 28th July 1814, Mary left her father’s house and met Shelley, who had a couch waiting (Marsh 185-6)

The pair of them struggled, they “eloped, endured separation, poverty, and the death of an infant child, before retreating to Villa Diodati with their second child” (Gaull 248). They took with them Mary’s stepsister, who changed her name from Jane to Claire Clairmont. Mrs. Godwin attempted to retrieve her daughter, and indeed found the three, but while ignoring Mary and Percy was unsuccessful in convincing Claire to return home. Moreover, William Godwin was furious with Mary for her elopement; once again Mary's life becomes a scale, while she gained the love of Shelley, her relationship with her family became colder than ever.

Here the famous tale of Frankenstein begins:

In Villa Diodati on Lake Leman in Switzerland, temporary residence of Lord Byron, now a notorious outcast from English society; Percy Shelley, a poet who was hardly known at all; his mistress, Mary Godwin and their six-month-old son; Claire Clairmont, Mary’s half-sister pregnant with Byron’s child; John Polidori, a precocious young physician and Byron’s travelling companion; and, for a brief visit in August, “Monk” Lewis. There they passed the long rain days and nights in conversation about philosophy, science, religion, and literature; they rowed, walked, told tales, and proposed a contest in which each would write his own ghost story. Two major gothic works resulted: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein: or The Modern Prometheus (1818) and John Polidori’s The Vampyre (1819), both exploring the perpetuation of biological as opposed to spiritual life. (Gaull 245)

Though the particularities are uncertain, “we know is that [Shelley] began writing the novel in June 1816, and that it was completed on 14th May 1817” (Marsh 190). During this time, upon “returning to England [from Italy] with an unfinished Frankenstein, [the Shelleys]  encountered two suicides, Fanny Imlay, Mary’s other half sister, and Harriet Shelley, several months pregnant, drowned in the Serpentine in Hyde Park. Within less than a month Mary and Percy were married, and while awaiting the birth of their third child, she completed Frankenstein, published the following March (1818). Over the next five years, Shelley drowned; two more children died, and Mary, a widow at twenty-five, returned to England with their one surviving child. Frankenstein had already been adapted for the stage” (Gaul 248) Mary Shelley’s life remained a constant struggle; her marriage to Shelley suffered many hardships, and  “Mary’s pregnancy ended in miscarriage on 16th June 1822, and she nearly died from the consequent hemorrhage. She was saved by her husband’s timely action, sitting her in an ice bath. Only a month later, Shelley himself was dead. After Shelley’s death, Mary suffered terribly from remorse because the last few months of their married life together were soured by her own fouled temper” (Marsh 190). It has consequently been articulated that in the 1823 edition of the novel's preface, Mary “Shelley’s reference to the novel as “my hideous progeny” may reflect on her 1822 miscarriage, although she follows by bidding that literary progeny to go into the world and prosper, claiming that it represents for her that happier time prior to experienced the “death and grief” that characterized her novel” (Brackett 104) With only one of her five children surviving the age of adulthood (Percy Florence Shelley), Frankenstein takes a personal approach. Shelley knew better than most, “the cycle of birth and death, a circle in which death was repeatedly overtaking birth, in which one life was gained at the expense of another” (Gaull 248).

    To resume specifically on the publication history, “the 1818 edition of Frankenstein, published by Lackington, Hughes, Harding, Mavor and Jones, printed 500 copies at the expensive price of the standard three volume novel. The 1823 edition was a small one in terms of print size. One would imagine, then, that it was with the Bentley edition of 1831 that Frankenstein gained a wider, mass audience” (Allen 96). Recall, it was also the 1831 edition that Percy Shelley had edited, with “a rough estimate of 4,000 words which can be traced to [his] pen, as he helped his wife improve and develop the draft and then the fair copy” (Allen 89), erasing the epigraph, altering the title pages, and editing facts in the plotline throughout the narrative. It seems, Percy Shelley appeared in want to tame his wife’s radical novel, and most notably he edited the later edition so that “Elizabeth is no longer directly related to Victor, instead of being his ‘cousin’ she is in 1831 a ‘foundling’ brought into the Frankenstein household. This change, for Mellor, indicates that Shelley is domesticating her representation of the relationship between Elizabeth and Victor, taming the radical ‘incestuous overtones’ of 1818, with a more conventionally acceptable portrayal of Elizabeth as ‘the Victorian “angel in the house’’ (Allen 93).

      Graham Allen does a wonderful job in speculating some edits and alterations between the first three editions of Frankenstein:

A recognition that readers need to register the differences created by the changes in the text by its republication in 1823 and 1831 is of longer standing and has created a far more diverse critical discussion. The 1818 edition...was the product of the collaborative labour of the Shelleys. The 1823 edition, brought out perhaps to try and capitalize on the first theatrical production of the novel, was managed by Godwin and includes over 120 small changes made by him to the text (see Crook, ‘Defence’, p. 18). The Thomas copy, referred to by many scholars of the novel’s history, concerns the annotated copy Shelley left behind her in Italy in 1823, a copy which demonstrates that she did intend from an early period to produce a revised version of the novel. The 1831 edition was published in Bentley’s Standard Novels series and included Shelley’s famous introduction. This edition used the 1823 version as copy text and so retained the vast majority of Godwin’s minor alterations. It also presented significant major and minor changes by Shelley herself and has been read by many modern critics as radically altering the novel....Shelley, like Wordsworth, underwent a personal movement towards conservative politics which significantly altered her great masterpiece and produced what are in effect two novels: the politically radical 1818 and the politically conservative 1831. The comments also make it clear that the critical debate about the two versions of Frankenstein do not simply rest on interpretations of the specific changes Shelley made to her novel; they also rest on a reading of Shelley’s biography and the question which has coloured the critical reception of her work since her own lifetime: did Shelley reject the political radicalism of her circle after the deaths of P. B. Shelley and Byron in the early 1820s? Those critics who argue that she did move towards forms of political quietism or conservatism invariably favour 1818 over 1831. (Allen  91-2)

To conclude, Frankenstein (and Shelley) suffered hardships; “Frankenstein being out of print, with the odd exception, throughout the 1850s, 1860s and 1870s” (Allen 97). It seems it was “not until the 1880s, when it came out of its previous copyright restrictions, [that] Frankenstein finally reach the reading public it was always destined to find. As St. Clair notes: ‘In its first year, the first reprint of Frankenstein sold more copies than all of the previous editions put together”, and only “at the turn of the nineteenth century, eighty years after its first appearance, Frankenstein at last became accessible to the whole reading nation" (Allen 97)

Useful resources on publication history:

The real story behind the publication of Frankenstein, of Mary Shelley, is as tragic and conflicted as the novel itself. In order to understand the origins of the novel’s publication, how Frankenstein was born, we must begin with its author, who “was just a young mother of eighteen when she wrote the novel, and she had little writing experience” (Gaull 248).

Fig 1. Meet Mary Shelley

Fig 3. Villa Diodati today

 

Frankenstein today

how did frankenstein influence literature to this day?

An interesting (and fun) fact to note is that “while the monster may be immediately recognizable in all of his various incarnations to later generations, fewer people have actually read the novel that introduced his unnamed character. Thus the monster is usually incorrectly referred to as “Frankenstein”, though that is, in fact, the name of his Creator” (Brackett 102). This misconception is one that anyone who has read the novel would have difficulty making, and yet, Frankenstein's name exceeds its reputation. That is, whether people know the true story of Frankenstein or not, they have heard about the mad scientist and his unholy invention.

    Not only is Frankenstein considered the ultimate example of Gothic literature, it is also widely taught among academic institutes (from High School to Postsecondary), read by the general public, and influenced the Sci-Fi and Horror genres immensely since its publication nearly two centuries ago. Nicholas Marsh briefly summarizes important works (you may have heard of but not realized) were influenced by  Frankenstein:

Robert Louis Stevenson’s The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and H.G. Well’s The Island of Dr. Moreau...however, in the broader sense of science fictions as a medium for investigating serious ethical dilemmas, we should also mention Wells’s many other ‘scientific romances’  such as The Time Machine (1895), or The War of the Worlds (1898); Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s The Lost world (1912); and numerous twentieth century works such as John Wyndham’s The Day of the Triffids (1951) and The Chrysalids (1955), both of which explore the consequences of scientific irresponsibility, and Isaac Asimov’s Robot series, on the theme of artificial life. (Marsh 215)

There have been countless adaptations of Frankenstein in modern culture. Thematically, Frankenstein proved to be fundemental to the world of literature, and is often referenced in literary circles.

Political climate behind  the novel

how did the political climate throughout Mary shelley's life influence  frankenstein?

Fig 4. Storms in 1816 Britain

Mary Shelley grew up in a radical and political household, with “Mary’s father, William Godwin...published his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice in 1793, not to mention Tom Paine’s Rights of Man (1791) and Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)” (Marsh 204); her parents' texts were widely popular, widely radical, and dangerously treasonous in England. In fact, her father “sat in the treason trials outrageously supporting the accused, in 1794” (Marsh 204). Welcome to the life of Mary Godwin: she grew up in a  household  admiring   her radical father

and everlastingly proud of her feminist mother. Evidently, “as Godwin’s and Wollstonecraft's daughter and Shelley’s consort and then wife, Mary was surrounded by the political angers, frustrations, debates and outrages of the time. In Frankenstein...she created the daemon as a vehicle to symbolize the excluded, exploited and dispossessed” (Marsh 205-6). Though you may note that Godwin’s text Enquiry Concerning Political Justice and Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman were published in 1791 and 1792, some time before Mary Godwin was born (in 1797), her parents remained popular radical figures throughout the majority of her life, and as “Mary was approaching her 20th year, and writing Frankenstein, nearly 30 years later, the radicals were still waiting for things to get better” (Marsh 204).

     The absurdity of Frankenstein to the readers of the Nineteenth Century was Shelley herself; the constant dilemma of how a young lady such as herself could have written such a text was ungraspable to many, who continued to presume her husband, Percy Shelley, had (by the least) much to do with the text’s contents. This, in out day, is easily and sympathetically understood through the biography of Mary Shelley’s life, as we have seen in the sections above. Shelley was closely related to danger, political struggles for freedom, gender equality, and death throughout her entire life:

What was the political climate of the Frankenstein decade? International relations were in chaos after the long efforts of the Napoleonic wars. The allies entered Paris and Napoleon was defeated at the beginning of April 1814; and that same summer Mary and Shelley and Claire Clairmont traveled through a disastrously war-ravaged France on their ‘Six Weeks’ Tour of elopement. They were back before two months had passed, and remained there during Napoleon’s reappearance the following year- the ‘hundred days’ leading to his final defeat at Waterloo in June 1815. Just 12 months after Waterloo, Mary was in the Maison Chapuis on the shores of Lake Geneva, beginning to write Frankenstein. The wars against Napoleonic and Revolutionary France were a huge international upheaval. They lasted with only a short intermission, more than 20 years. (Marsh 203)

Additionally:

The industrial revolution rolled onward, creating a growing population of urban workers in slum housing, exploited by long hours and pitiful wages while their employers became rich. Greater equality, freedom, and justice in British society were long overdue: hence the Luddite industrial troubles that plagued the decade. Seventeen Luddites were tried and hanged at York after disturbances across the midlands and the North of England, in 1811-1813; the Pentrich rising took place in 1817; and the Peterloo massacre occurred in 1819. (Marsh 204)

 

How did this affect the composition of Frankenstein? How could it not! The summer of 1816, when the text was written, is also commonly known as The-Year-Without-Summer. Mount Tambora’s rupture caused Ireland, France, and England to suffer from lack of sunlight, cold and dark weather for nearly a year. Crops were dying, the economy was suffering. Indeed, Mary Shelley lived through very peculiar times, in a very distinct and unusual household. It becomes, I argue, understandable to unravel the foundations of Frankenstein, particularly in relation to the edits made to the edits between the 1818 and 1831 editions:

Belying the idea that Shelley stripped the 1831 version of the novel’s former historical and politically topical references, Elizabeth’s Milanese father in 1831, perhaps still lingering in an Austrian prison, reminds readers of the continued oppression of Italy by Austria and of Shelley’s support for Italian national liberty. Once we recognize that Shelley did not give up on her peculiar brand of reformist politics in the 1830s we no longer need to make any ideological choice between the 1818 and 1831 versions of Frankenstein. In place of that choice we can begin, as some critics have, to trace the fascinating revisions, reinforcements and transformations that 1831 makes to 1818. Just as we found a mode of critical reading incorporated into 1818, so 1831 can be understood as another stage in that ongoing, internal rereading of Shelley’s story. (Allen 97)

Additionally:

in 1831, Mary Shelley reshaped her horror story to reflect her pessimistic conviction that the universe is determined by a destiny blind to human needs or efforts . . . In 1818 Victor Frankenstein possessed free will or the capacity for meaningful moral choice – he could have abandoned his quest for the ‘principle of life’, he could have cared for his creature, he could have protected Elizabeth. In 1831 such choice is denied him. He is the pawn of forces beyond his knowledge or control. Again and again [in 1831], Mary Shelley reassigns human actions to chance or fate. (Allen 95)

Critics conclude  ”Mary was disloyal to the memory of her husband, who was politically far more outspoken and radical than she represented him; and according to this view, Mary was one of those Romantics -like Wordsworth- who were firebrands in their youth, but sold out to the conservative establishment later in life” (Marsh 194). What seems like a sad conclusion to such a unique individual in the Nineteenth Century, becomes somewhat sadder, when in “23 July 1851, [Mary] suffered a series of fits and went into a coma. This lasted for eight days, and she died on 1st February” (Marsh 194).

 

In many ways Frankenstein  is, was, became, and shaped to become, influenced by its author as she grew up, and to this day remains (to many) her legacy.  

Fig 5. In case you are interested in more information about The-Year-Without-Summer, here is a short documentary.

Fig 6. In case you are interested in more information about the French Revolution and Napoleon, here is a short documentary.

Fig 7. This video explains quite relevantly how Romanticism can be defined, and indirectly shows why Frankenstein was a revolution of its own when it was published (with all its religious and anti-religous themes). Nice to check out if you are confused!

ANonymity

Why would mary shelley not place her name on the novel?  WAs this popular at the time for authors to d0?

Sorry! This section is under construction.

COMING SOON!

The First and third editions

With an emphasis on percy shelley's involvement; PS review and preface

Sorry! This section is under construction.

COMING SOON!

bottom of page